Economic activity and NS-SeC for people aged 65-74
An error in processing has resulted in under estimation of the numbers of economically inactive people aged 65 - 74 who had never worked in tables containing these data throughout England and Wales This also has a significant impact on tables containing NS-SeC figures derived from this economic activity information. The errors do not affect Census figures for Scotland or Northern Ireland.
The error arose because a processing instruction which was applied to the data for people of all ages deemed that those aged 65-74 who did not supply information on occupation and industry had in fact done so. A response of "no" or no answer to the 'Have you ever worked' question was then changed to 'having ever worked'. In most cases this was the correct procedure, but it exaggerated the number 'having ever worked', more particularly for women than men.
The processing instruction was not applied to those people who did not respond to the 'Date of birth' question, and whose age was consequently imputed, and this resulted in the published tables showing a small number of economically inactive people aged 65-74 who have never worked.
Comparison with other sources suggests that the shortfall in the number of people aged 65 - 74 in England and Wales who had never worked is in the region of 150,000-200,000.
Users are advised either to restrict analyses of ever worked and NS-SeC to the economically active population and to economically inactive people aged under 65, or to combine the 'never worked' and 'not classifiable for other reasons' categories when analysing NS-SeC.
Correcting the individual records and retabulating has been ruled out on practicality grounds. It would involve a complete rerun of the Census processing.
|